SOME REMARKS ON WEAKLY S-LASKERIAN MODULES

Document Type : Original Manuscript

Author

Department of Mathematics, Saurashtra University, P.O. Box 360005, Rajkot, India.

10.22044/jas.2025.14472.1832

Abstract

The rings considered in this paper are commutative with identity and the modules considered are modules over commutative rings and are unitary. We use R to denote a ring, S to denote a multiplicatively closed subset of R, and M to denote a module over R. We say that M is an S-Laskerian (respectively, a strongly S-Laskerian) R-module if M is an S-finite R-module and for any submodule N of M, either (N: M) meets S or there exist t in S and an S-decomposable (respectively, a strongly S-decomposable) submodule K of M such that tN is a submodule of K and K is contained in N. We say that M is a weakly S-Laskerian (respectively, weakly strongly S-Laskerian) R-module if each S-finite proper submodule of M is an S-Laskerian (respectively, a strongly Laskerian ) R-module. In this paper, we discuss some results on basic properties of weaklly S-Laskerian modules and we extend some of the properties of S-Laskerian modules to weakly S-Laskerian modules.

Keywords


 1. D. D. Anderson and T. Dumitrescu, S-Noetherian rings, Comm. Algebra, 30(9) (2002),  4407–4416.
2. H. Ansari-Toroghy and S. S. Pourmortazavi, On S-primary submodules, Int. Electron. J. Algebra, 31 (2022), 74–89.
3. M. F. Atiyah and I. G. Macdonald, Introduction to Commutative Algebra, Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts, 1969.
4. N. Bourbaki, Commutative Algebra, Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts, 1972.
5. Z. A. El-Bast and P. P. Smith, Multiplication modules, Comm. Algebra, 16(4) (1988), 755–779.
6. M. Essebti, S-primary ideals of a commutative ring, Comm. Algebra, 50(3) (2022), 988– 997.
7. F. Farshadifar, S-secondary submodules of a module, Comm. Algebra, 49(4) (2021), 1394– 1404.
8. R. Gilmer and W. Heinzer, The Laskerian property, power series rings and Noetherian spectra, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 79(1) (1980), 13–16.
9. W. Heinzer and D. Lantz, The Laskerian property in commutative rings, J. Algebra, 72(1) (1981), 101–114.
10. D. K. Kim and J. W. Lim, A note on weakly S-Noetherian rings, Symmetry, 12(3) (2020), Article ID: 419.
11. N. Mahdou and A. R. Hassani, On weakly-Noetherian rings, Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Politec. Torino, 70(3) (2012), 289–296.
12. N. Radu, Sur les Anneaux laskeriens, In: Proceedings of the Week of Algebraic Geometry, Bucharest, 1980, Teubner texte, Stuttgart, Band 40, 1981.
13. T. Singh, A. U. Ansari and S. D. Kumar, Existence and uniqueness of S-primary decomposition in S-Noetherian modules, Comm. Algebra, 52(10) (2024), 4515–4524.
14. S. Visweswaran, Intermediate rings between D + I and K[y1; : : : ; yt], Comm. Algebra, 18(2) (1990), 309–345.
15. S. Visweswaran, Some results on S-Laskerian modules, J. Algebra Appl., 24(2) (2025), Article ID: 2550058.
16. S. Visweswaran, Some results on S-primary ideals of a commutative ring, Beitr. Algebra Geom., 63(2) (2022), 247–266.
17. S. Visweswaran, The effect of S-accr on intermediate rings between certain pairs of rings, Int. Electron. J. Algebra, 32 (2022), 101–128.
18. S. Visweswaran, When is (D; K) an S-accr pair?, Arab J. Math. Sci., 29(1) (2023), 100–118.
19. S. Visweswaran, When is (D + I; K + I) an S-Laskerian pair?, Gulf J. Math., 14(1) (2023), 45–53.